![]() ![]() With almost all the central and shoulder blocks, there are numerous stone ejectors.Įven though they are smaller, they are still able to prevent stones from getting stuck in the grooves, allowing the tire to move smoothly. With a lower void ratio, Rubitrek AT will not have the same biting ability as its competitors, but it still crawls better than many tires in its class. It can perform well on rocks, but it cannot compete with its counterpart. The tread of the tire can be damaged if stones or pebbles get stuck between the grooves. The AT3W has an open tread with higher void ratio, but fewer stone ejectors than the other tire, so it can’t emit stones more aggressively. ![]() Two features of a tire come into play on rocky terrains, the void ratio and the stone ejectors. However, if we talk about ice, the situation is completely different.īecause of its higher contact patch and frequent sipes, along with deep lateral and longitudinal grooves, this tire performs really well on ice because it wipes away water and maintains grip. The Rubitrek AT also performs well on snow due to its deep grooves, but it can’t compete with its competitor because deep grooves can trap snow particles and cause the tire to get stuck. As a result of open shoulders, handling performance is also good.ĭue to its small contact patch, this tire cannot perform well on ice. As a result, the results are not much different from those of muddy terrain.ĭue to its wider grooves, AT3W channels out soft snow more efficiently without sacrificing grip. The tire with a higher void ratio performs well on mud, and the same is true for soft snow. The Rubitrek AT performs quite well in mud due to its deeper grooves, but it cannot overcome its rival because its grooves aren’t wide enough to catch more mud particles and throw them backwards.īecause of the open shoulder design, it performs well while cornering in mud, but be careful when using this tire in deep mud since it may get stuck. The wide grooves allow mud to easily pass through, keeping the tire moving forward, and the wide channels between the shoulder blocks allow it to take turns easily in muddy swamps. Off-road traction comparisonĪs AT3W has a higher void ratio, it performs well in muddy terrain. ![]() While it has narrower grooves, increased tread depth fills the gap as deep grooves improve water channeling, which makes this tire good for hydroplaning resistance.ĭue to its slightly lower contact patch, AT3W doesn’t outperform its counterpart in terms of wet traction, but due to its good number of sipes, it performs well on wet surfaces as well.Īquaplaning resistance of this tire is similar to the other one because the wide grooves allow the water to pass away, maintaining contact with the ground. While both tires have similar numbers of sipes, the Rubitrack has a greater contact patch, so it performs well on wet surfaces as well.Ī good handling experience is also provided by the tire’s enhanced grip. Rubitrek is clearly the winner when it comes to dry traction. On dry surfaces, more tire area is in contact with the road, improving grip.įurthermore, this tire has narrow grooves on the shoulders as well, so it provides more contact area while cornering, resulting in improved handling.īecause AT3W has wider grooves, its contact patch is smaller, which reduces its grip on dry surfaces, and its handling is also not as good as the other tire for the same reason: having less contact area from the shoulder sides, it has moderate grip when cornering. The narrower grooves of AT allow a higher contact patch with the road on dry roads. The tread has several small stone emitters and is covered with sipes.ĭetailed comparison of Falken Rubitrek and Wildpeak:.There are rectangles and trapeziums in the side rows.The central part of the tread is divided into three rows, with small blocks on the two side rows and longer tread blocks in the center row.The shoulder lugs of this tire have sharp edges and all have similar shapes.Image Credit: Pexels Overview of the Falken Rubitrek:īecause Rubitrek has fewer wide grooves but more tread depth, its tread pattern is relatively closed. The central tread blocks also come in different shapes most have sharp edges, and some are hook-shaped.The tread pattern is aggressive with edgy shoulder blocks. There are two types of shoulder lugs present, some with an empty space in the middle and others without.There are grooves surrounding all tread blocks, but their depth is lesser than its counterpart.Video of Falken Wildpeak AT3/W Vs Falken Rubitrek A/Tĭue to its open tread pattern, Wildpeak has a higher void ratio than its competitors. ![]() Brief summary of Falken Wildpeak AT3/W Vs Falken Rubitrek A/T.Detailed comparison of Falken Rubitrek and Wildpeak:. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |